Cases 71 - 80 of 286
Kim v. Arrondi Enriched Learning and Consulting, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv02114
Defendant:
Eunbee Kim, Arrondi Enriched Learning and Consulting, Inc., XYZ Corps 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
Moonyoung Kim
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
GAMBINO v. SIMCO LOGISTICS, INC. et al
as 3:2019cv09322
Defendant:
SIMCO LOGISTICS, INC., JOHN DOE 1-V, ABC INC. and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY GAMBINO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Seo v. I.P.T Name And Design Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv02202
Defendant:
Eun Chul Shin, Diego Shin, I.P.T Name And Design Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Hyuk Jin Seo
HAMIGA et al v. ESTATE OF BEATRICE ZIMMERMAN et al
as 2:2019cv05971
Defendant:
Estate of William Zimmerman, Paul Zimmerman, Estate of Beatrice Zimmerman and others
Plaintiff:
Agnieszka Hamiga, Beata Szeloch and Jozef Hamiga
Yuan et al v. & Hair Lounge Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv11905
Defendant:
& HAIR LOUNGE INC, JANE DOE, LU CHEN LUNG and others
Plaintiff:
Dong Yuan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Lee v. Circle NYC Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv04854
Defendant:
Robert Kwak, Circle NYC Inc., Joseph Ko and others
Plaintiff:
DONG HA LEE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Sun v. Li Ya Nail Spa Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv06609
Defendant:
AILLEN NAIL & SPA INC., LI YA NAIL SPA INC., Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Mengni Sun
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Luina v. L3 Funding LLC et al
as 1:2018cv11208
Defendant:
L3 FUNDING LLC, Victor Rodriguez, Kris Blaku and others
Plaintiff:
David Luina
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Luyando v. Pay-O-Matic Check Cashing Corp. et al
as 1:2018cv11114
Defendant:
John and Jane Does 1-100, The Pay-O-Matic Corp and Pay-O-Matic Check Cashing Corp.
Plaintiff:
Carmen Luyando
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Zang v. Daxi Sichuan Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv06910
Defendant:
Shihai Liu, John Doe #1-10 and Jane Doe #1-10 and Daxi Sichuan Inc.
Plaintiff:
Zhongzhi Zang
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
