Cases 1 - 10 of 30
BROWN v. Curtis Bay Medical Waste Services, LLC
as 2:2023cv04168
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY BROWN
Defendant:
Curtis Bay Medical Waste Services, LLC and Sharps Compliance, Inc. of Texas
COLBERT et al v. HAND IN HAND GROUP INC. et al
as 2:2022cv03055
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA COLBERT and LORI BROWN
Defendant:
HAND IN HAND GROUP INC. doing business as CARING MATTERS HOME CARE, ROMAR CORPORATION doing business as CARING MATTERS HOME CARE, JOHN DOES #1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Brown v. The Meadows at East Mountain-Barre for Nursing and Rehabilitation LLC
as 3:2022cv00828
Plaintiff:
Beth Brown
Defendant:
The Meadows at East Mountain-Barre for Nursing and Rehabilitation LLC doing business as The Gardens at East Mountain
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
BROWN v. KADENCE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
as 2:2022cv01097
Plaintiff:
CODY BROWN
Defendant:
KADENCE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
BUHLER et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
as 2:2020cv04911
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Plaintiff:
BRIAN BUHLER, AMANDA WINTER, TIFFANY HAWKINS and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
GHEBRE-BROWN v. SANTANDER BANK N.A.
as 2:2019cv05521
Plaintiff:
EDEN GHEBRE-BROWN
Defendant:
SANTANDER BANK N.A.
Brown v. Lyndon Diner West, Inc.
as 1:2019cv01227
Plaintiff:
Crystalle Brown and Crystal
Defendant:
Lyndon Diner West, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Frick v. Spiess et al
as 1:2018cv01260
Plaintiff:
John E. Frick
Defendant:
George C. Spiess, Chris Norris and Charles Rees Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN et al v. PROGRESSIVES BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES, INC.
as 2:2016cv06054
Plaintiff:
SARINA BROWN , APRIL WALKER and MICHELLE AARON
Defendant:
PROGRESSIVES BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
HENRY et al v. MIKMAR GROUP, INC.
as 2:2016cv00957
Plaintiff:
KEISHA HENRY and TANIKA BROWN
Defendant:
MIKMAR GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
