Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Seiber v. Shelby County Government
as 2:2024cv02261
Plaintiff:
Mary E Seiber
Defendant:
Shelby County Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Alvarez v. Memphis-Shelby County Board of Education
as 2:2022cv02303
Plaintiff:
Jeanily Alvarez
Defendant:
Memphis-Shelby County Board of Education
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Harden v. Shelby County Health Care Corp
as 2:2022cv02075
Plaintiff:
Rodraious Harden
Defendant:
Shelby County Health Care Corp. doing business as Regional One Health
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Rhea v. West TN Violent Crime & Drug Task Force, et al
as 2:2017cv02267
Plaintiff:
Milton Rhea
Defendant:
West Tennessee Violent Crime & Drug Task Force and Shelby County Government
Miscellaneou:
Donna Russell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Rhea v. West Tennessee Violent Crime and Drug Task Force
as 2:2017cv02136
Plaintiff:
Milton Rhea
Defendant:
West Tennessee Violent Crime and Drug Task Force for the Twenty-Eighth Judicial District and Shelby County Government
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Pritchett v. Econo Auto Painting of Nashville, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv02498
Plaintiff:
Jason Hall Pritchett
Defendant:
Econo Auto Painting of Nashville, Inc., Econo Auto Painting of Memphis, Inc., Econo Auto Painting of Shelby County, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Robles et al. v. Shelby County, Tennessee
as 2:2007cv02636
Plaintiff:
Connie Robles, Tina McElravey, Constance Brown and others
Defendant:
Shelby County, Tennessee and Shelby County, Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Tomsick v. Shelby County,Tennessee
as 2:2007cv02202
Plaintiff:
Rosalyn Tomsick and Rosalyn Tomsick
Defendant:
Shelby County,Tennessee and Shelby County,Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
