Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Mitchell v. United States Postal Service
as 1:2023cv01169
Plaintiff:
Brian Mitchell
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Wintering v. Cleveland State University
as 1:2023cv00563
Plaintiff:
Meredith Wintering
Defendant:
Cleveland State University
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203 Equal Pay Act
Heller v. Kent State University
as 5:2022cv00477
Plaintiff:
Carol Heller
Defendant:
Kent State University
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Daniels v. Ohio State University Physicians, Inc.
as 2:2020cv05859
Plaintiff:
Alice Daniels
Defendant:
Ohio State University Physicians, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
United States of America v. Famarr, LLC
as 5:2020cv02262
Defendant:
Famarr, L.L.C. doing business as Los Tios Authentic Mexican Grill & Cuisine
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Dill v. Drake-State Air, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00373
Defendant:
Drake-State Air, Inc. and Steve M Chrismer
Plaintiff:
Ronald Dill
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Holloway v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
as 1:2020cv00026
Plaintiff:
Bryant Holloway
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Secretary of United States Department of Labor v. Sunstar Akron, Inc., et al
as 5:2019cv02583
Defendant:
Punarvasu S. Patel and Sunstar Akron, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Secretary of United States Department of Labor
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Kyle v. Tri-State Concrete Sawing, Inc.
as 1:2019cv00854
Defendant:
Tri-State Concrete Sawing, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Steven Kyle
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Roshon v. Eagle Research Group, Inc.
as 2:2016cv00968
Defendant:
Eagle Research Group, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Roshon and Stephen R. Roshon, Jr.
Interested Party:
United States Department of Energy
Not Classified By Court:
Robert M Kincaid
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
