Cases 1 - 10 of 209
Greathouse v. Neighborhood Automotive Service & Transmission Repair, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Thomas Greathouse
Defendant:
Neighborhood Automotive Service & Transmission Repair, LLC and William Conley
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Berry et al v. Ryze Claim Solutions LLC
as 2:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Magdalene Berry and Natasha Williams
Defendant:
Ryze Claim Solutions LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Milburn et al v. Trop, Inc et al
as 1:2024cv01631
Plaintiff:
Julie Milburn and Jessica Harris
Defendant:
Trop, Inc doing business as Pink Pony, Dennis Williams and Michael A. Kap
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Denbo v. Prime Rangers, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00883
Plaintiff:
Christian Denbo
Defendant:
Prime Rangers, Inc. and Rinnel Williams
Williams v. DeJoy et al
as 2:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Michelle Williams
Defendant:
Louis DeJoy, Orelene Garcia, Dwayne Gray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Rooks v. Lease My Marketing, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
William Rooks
Defendant:
Lease My Marketing, LLC and Adam Allen
Ramsey et al v. Ayvaz Pizza, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv04801
Plaintiff:
Olivia Ramsey and William Stratmann
Defendant:
Ayvaz Pizza, LLC and Shoukat Dhanani
ADCOCK v. WARD HOME SERVICES
as 3:2023cv00089
Plaintiff:
DYLAN ADCOCK
Defendant:
WARD HOME SERVICES doing business as ACE HANDYMAN SERVICES EAST METRO ATLANTA (543) and WILLIAM WARD
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
GRUBBS v. COCHRAN et al
as 5:2023cv00244
Plaintiff:
KEITH GRUBBS
Defendant:
WILLIAM COCHRAN, COCHRAN COACHWORKS, WILLIAM J COCHRAN and others
Griner v. Prime Rangers, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01760
Plaintiff:
Charles Griner
Defendant:
Prime Rangers, Inc., Rangers Enterprise Satellite LLC and Rinnel Williams
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
