Cases 51 - 56 of 56
Henley v. Local Union No 372, UAW Building Corporation et al
as 2:2008cv12850
Plaintiff:
Sherin Henley
Defendant:
Local Union No 372, UAW Building Corporation, Local Union No 372, Local 889 Building Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio
Howard v. MGM Grand Detroit, L. L. C. et al
as 5:2008cv10253
Plaintiff:
Trennese Howard
Defendant:
MGM Grand Detroit, L. L. C., United Automobile Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, International Union (UAW) and United Automobile Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, International Union Local 7777
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
King v. United Automobile Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, International Union (UAW) et al
as 2:2008cv10252
Plaintiff:
Joyce P King
Defendant:
United Automobile Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, International Union (UAW), AFL-CIO Local 235, Roger Ogles and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Campbell v. Greektown Casino et al
as 2:2007cv15258
Plaintiff:
Rodwell Campbell
Defendant:
Greektown Casino, UAW Local 7777, Detroit Casino Council and UAW Local 7777, Detroit Casino Council
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Demott et al v. UAW International Union et al
as 2:2007cv12648
Plaintiff:
Angela Demott, Michelle Scott, Kathleen Allard and others
Defendant:
UAW International Union, UAW Local 598 and General Motors Corporation
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, UAW Local 771 v. Maxi Container, Incorporated
as 2:2007cv12508
Plaintiff:
International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, UAW Local 771
Defendant:
Maxi Container, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
