Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Sciandra v. The New York Times et al
as 1:2023cv00239
Plaintiff:
Thomas Sciandra
Defendant:
The New York Times, John Doe and Jane Doe "1" through "10", inclusive and John Doe and Jane Doe 1-10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Klein v. The New York Times Company
as 1:2018cv02951
Plaintiff:
Eugene Klein
Defendant:
The New York Times Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Ricci v. GoDaddy.com
as 14-1732
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Peter Ricci and Barbara Ricci
Defendant - Appellee:
Teamsters Union Local 456, GoDaddy.com and The New York Times Company
Ricci et al v. Go Daddy.com et al
as 7:2013cv07729
Plaintiff:
Peter Ricci and Barbara Ricci
Defendant:
Teamsters Union Local 456 , Go Daddy.com and The New York Times Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 151
Lam et al v. The New York Times Company et al
as 1:2009cv05700
Plaintiff:
Steve S. Lam and Sammy Jackson
Defendant:
The New York Times Company, The New York Times Company, City and Suburban Delivery Systems, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Pelzman et al v. DeAngelis et al
as 1:2009cv04578
Plaintiff:
Neil Pelzman and John Does 1-40
Defendant:
Larry DeAngelis, New York Mailers Union No.6, Local 14170, Communications Workers of America, Communications Workers of America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Burke et al v. DeAngelis et al
as 1:2009cv02302
Plaintiff:
Steven Burke, Vincent A. Daley, Frank Detto and others
Defendant:
Larry DeAngelis, New York Mailers Union No.6, Local 14170, Communications Workers of America and The New York Times
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Richardson v. The New York Times Company
as 7:2007cv00132
Plaintiff:
Edwin Richardson
Defendant:
The New York Times Company and The New York Times Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor Management Relations Act of 1947
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
