Cases 151 - 160 of 189
Nelson v. Leavitt
as 1:2008cv00005
Plaintiff:
Virginia E. Nelson
Defendant:
Mike Leavitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Poteete v. Kawneer Company, Inc. et al
as 2:2007cv00208
Plaintiff:
Richard A. Poteete
Defendant:
Kawneer Company, Inc. and Alcoa, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Guntharp v. Glock, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00265
Plaintiff:
Kent Guntharp
Defendant:
Glock, Inc. and Gary Fletcher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Riordan v. Kohler Co.
as 3:2007cv00590
Plaintiff:
Patrick Riordan and Patrick Riordan
Defendant:
Kohler Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Smith v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
as 3:2007cv00467
Plaintiff:
Lottie Smith
Defendant:
UNUM Life Insurance Company of America and UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1002 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Hampton v. EOG Resources, Inc. et al
as 3:2007cv00438
Plaintiff:
Clyde F. Hampton, Jr. and Clyde F. Hampton, Jr.
Defendant:
EOG Resources, Inc., EOG Resources, Inc. and Tim Singley
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Winborne v. Sunshine Health Care, Inc.
as 1:2007cv00157
Plaintiff:
Barbara Winborne
Defendant:
Sunshine Health Care, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lawrence v. Plumrose USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00104
Plaintiff:
Samantha Lawrence
Defendant:
Plumrose USA, Inc. and Zurich American Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Hinton v. AT & T Mobility, L.L.C.
as 2:2007cv00085
Plaintiff:
Rebecca S. Hinton
Defendant:
AT & T Mobility, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1104 Recovery of Benefits to Employee
Palermo v. Palermo et al
as 5:2007cv00078
Plaintiff:
Richard Palermo
Defendant:
Sheila Palermo, LeTourneau Technologies, Inc., LeTourneau Technologies, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
