Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Carlow v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00322
Plaintiff:
Linda Carlow
Defendant:
Chevron U.S.A., Inc. , Chevron Corporation , Chevron Refinery Pascagoula and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sammies v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00323
Plaintiff:
Roxanne L. Sammies
Defendant:
Chevron U.S.A., Inc. , Chevron Corporation , Chevron Refinery Pascagoula and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson et al v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company et al
as 3:2014cv00694
Plaintiff:
Ketra Johnson and Carolyn Harris
Defendant:
Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company , Covenant Dove, LLC and John Does 1-3
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362
Kennedy v. Lahood
as 3:2014cv00607
Plaintiff:
Randy L. Kennedy
Defendant:
Ray Lahood and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Coleman v. Crum & Forster Holdings Corp. et al
as 3:2013cv00403
Plaintiff:
Darren Coleman
Defendant:
Crum & Forster Holdings Corp. , United States Fire Insurance Company , Kuhlman Electric Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Tanner v. Phil Guilbeau Offshore, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00154
Plaintiff:
Michael F. Tanner
Defendant:
Phil Guilbeau Offshore, Inc., M/V "Spencer Phillip and John Does 1 through 5
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Easterling v. AT&T Mobility, LLC et al
as 3:2009cv00558
Plaintiff:
Leslie Statham Easterling
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility, LLC, Bradlee R. Varner, Gates McDonald & Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Morgan v. Potter et al
as 2:2008cv00237
Plaintiff:
Angie Morgan
Defendant:
John E. Potter and John Doe 1-5
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Davis v. McRae's Stores Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00537
Plaintiff:
Joseph Davis, Jr.
Defendant:
McRae's Stores Services, Inc., McRae's Stores Services, Inc., Belk Stores Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
