Cases 41 - 50 of 55
Matherne v. Armour-Eckrich Meats LLC et al
as 2:2013cv06689
Defendant:
Armour-Eckrich Meats LLC, John Morrell & Co. and Smithfield Foods, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jody Matherne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cox v. Precision Surveillance Corporation et al
as 2:2013cv06600
Defendant:
Precision Surveillance Corporation and Steam Generating Team LLC
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Cox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Castro v. Rain CII Carbon LLC
as 2:2013cv04701
Plaintiff:
Walter Castro
Defendant:
Rain CII Carbon LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Pittman v. First Class Hotels, LLC et al
as 2:2013cv00352
Plaintiff:
Deandra Pittman
Defendant:
First Class Hotels, LLC and Waldorf Astoria Hotels
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 Cause Code Unknown
Rogers v. Bromac Title Services, LLC et al
as 2:2012cv02493
Defendant:
Bromac Title Services, LLC and Title Resource Group, LLC
Plaintiff:
Wanda Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1875 Juror Protection Act
Hawxhurst v. Sun Electrical and Instrumentation, LLC
as 3:2012cv00640
Plaintiff:
Daniel Hawxhurst
Defendant:
Sun Electrical and Instrumentation, LLC
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Ricalde v. Evonik Stockhausen, LLC et al
as 2:2012cv01188
Defendant:
Evonik Stockhausen, LLC and Edwin Mereand
Plaintiff:
Thomas Andrew Ricalde
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
National Labor Relations Board v. Nexxt Show, LLC
as 2:2011cv03128
Plaintiff:
National Labor Relations Board
Defendant:
Nexxt Show, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 160
Yargo v. UV Logistics, LLC
as 2:2011cv01380
Plaintiff:
Joseph Yargo
Defendant:
UV Logistics, LLC
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4301
Chavarria et al v. Catavoy Cotton Gin, LLC et al
as 1:2010cv01526
Plaintiff:
Michael Chavarria and Ramiro Conde, Jr.
Defendant:
Catavoy Cotton Gin, LLC and Roger Johnson
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
