Cases 81 - 90 of 2,523
Duncan v. TELEPERFORMANCE GROUP, INC.
as 9:2023cv81135
Plaintiff:
Erica Duncan
Defendant:
TELEPERFORMANCE GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor
Duncan v. TPUSA, Inc.
as 1:2023cv23032
Plaintiff:
Erica Duncan
Defendant:
TPUSA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Escasena v. Federal Express Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv22961
Plaintiff:
Leticia Escasena
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation and Aetna Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Compton v. Nachtsheim
as 2:2023cv00589
Plaintiff:
Michael Compton
Defendant:
Henry Nachsheim and Henry Nachtsheim
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Grant v. JPMorgan Chase & Company
as 9:2023cv81104
Plaintiff:
JUANNITA GRANT
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase & Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0754 Discrimination
GARCIA v. ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES LTD.
as 0:2023cv61476
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE GARCIA
Defendant:
ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES LTD.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203 Equal Pay Act
Polastry v. Gonzo Marketing Services, LLC
as 0:2023cv61466
Plaintiff:
Jesus Polastry
Defendant:
Gonzo Marketing Services, LLC doing business as GMS CONNECT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Sanchez v. Senior Living, LLC
as 6:2023cv01467
Plaintiff:
Omayra Sanchez
Defendant:
Senior Living, LLC doing business as Excellence Senior Living
Not Classified By Court:
Carlos Burruezo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Roman v. Ross Dress for Less Inc.
as 6:2023cv01466
Plaintiff:
Diana C. Roman
Defendant:
Ross Dress for Less Inc. doing business as DD's Discounts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Vales v. Magnolia Manor At Daytona Beach, LLC
as 6:2023cv01469
Plaintiff:
Christie Vales
Defendant:
Magnolia Manor At Daytona Beach, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.