Cases 1 - 10 of 521
EASTERN ATLANTIC STATES REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS, UBCJA v. ANGEL'S DRYWALL, INC.
as 3:2024cv06482
Petitioner:
EASTERN ATLANTIC STATES REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS, UBCJA
Respondent:
ANGEL'S DRYWALL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Loan
GALARZA v. CINCINNATI THERMAL SPRAY, INC.
as 2:2024cv06385
Defendant:
CINCINNATI THERMAL SPRAY, INC. and PEDRO GALARZA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
SWOPE v. ZYNEX MEDICAL INC et al
as 3:2024cv06322
Plaintiff:
DONNA SWOPE
Defendant:
ZYNEX MEDICAL INC., STEVEN BENASSO, JOHN DOES 1 through 5 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
MANSOUR et al v. CITY OF JERSEY CITY et al
as 2:2024cv06178
Plaintiff:
Norhan Mansour and Omar Polanco
Defendant:
CITY OF JERSEY CITY, JERSEY CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, Mayor STEVEN M. FULOP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio
VOREL v. SALKOVITZ et al
as 2:2024cv05933
Plaintiff:
AINSLIE H. VOREL
Defendant:
MARC SALKOVITZ and PAMELA SALKOVITZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
MARTIN v. METEM- A GE POWER BUSINESS et al
as 2:2024cv05648
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO MARTIN
Defendant:
METEM- A GE POWER BUSINESS, GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY and JOHN DOES 1-5 AND 6-10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 651 Occupational Safety/Health
KIM v. BNP MANAGEMENT LLC et al
as 2:2024cv05443
Plaintiff:
YEON HEE KIM
Defendant:
BNP MANAGEMENT LLC and JASON PARK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
KAHAN v. KIDDESIGNS, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv05153
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY KAHAN
Defendant:
KIDDESIGNS, INC., SDI TECHNOLOGIES, INC., HTI INDUSTRIES, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
MORRETT v. BRIGHTVIEW HOLDINGS, INC.
as 1:2024cv04879
Plaintiff:
GREG MORRETT
Defendant:
BRIGHTVIEW HOLDINGS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
