Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Spreckels Sugar Company, Inc. v. United Food and Commercial Workers, Local 135, AFL-CIO, CLC
as 3:2023cv00413
Plaintiff:
Spreckels Sugar Company, Inc.
Defendant:
United Food and Commercial Workers, Local 135, AFL-CIO, CLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0185 Labor: Suits by and against Labor Organizations
Maurer v. International Brotherhood of Electical Workers, Local 569, AFL-CIO et al
as 3:2016cv00676
Plaintiff:
Martin Maurer
Defendant:
International Brotherhood of Electical Workers, Local 569, AFL-CIO and San Diego Electrical Joint Apprenticeship and Training Committee
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0185 Labor: Suits by and against Labor Organizations
Demetris et al v. Transport Workers Union of America, AFL-CIO
as 3:2013cv05566
Plaintiff:
Daniel Demetris , William Burke , Daniel Burstein and others
Defendant:
Transport Workers Union of America, AFL-CIO
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 160
Bakery Confectionery Tobacco Workers and Grain Millers International Union AFL-CIO Local 85 v. Raley's
as 2:2010cv01574
Petitioner:
Bakery Confectionery Tobacco Workers and Grain Millers International Union AFL-CIO Local 85
Respondent:
Raley's
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Bakery Confectionery Tobacco Workers and Grain Millers International Union AFL-CIO Local 85 v. Raley's
as 2:2010at00841
Petitioner:
- Bakery Confectionery Tobacco Workers and Grain Millers International Union AFL-CIO Local 85
Respondent:
Raley's
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
United Steel, Paper & Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial & Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO, CLC et al v. ConocoPhillips Company et al
as 2:2009cv05501
Plaintiff:
United Steel, Paper & Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial & Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO, CLC, United Steel, Paper & Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial & Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO, CLC, United Steel, Paper & Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial & Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO, CLC and others
Defendant:
ConocoPhillips Company, ConocoPhillips Company, ConocoPhillips Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Type:
Labor
United Steel Paper & Forestry Rubber Manufacturing Energy Allied Industrial & Service Workers International Union AFL-CIO CLC et al v. ConocoPhillips Company
as 2:2008cv02068
Plaintiff:
United Steel Paper & Forestry Rubber Manufacturing Energy Allied Industrial & Service Workers International Union AFL-CIO CLC, United Steel Paper & Forestry Rubber Manufacturing Energy Allied Industrial & Service Workers International Union AFL-CIO CLC, United Steel Paper & Forestry Rubber Manufacturing Energy Allied Industrial & Service Workers International Union AFL-CIO CLC and others
Defendant:
ConocoPhillips Company, ConocoPhillips Company, ConocoPhillips Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Christopher M. Souza, and all others similarly situated. v. Pacific Bell Telephone Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv01817
Defendant:
Pacific Bell Telephone Company, Inc., AT&T Communications Of California, Inc., SBC Communications, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher M. Souza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
CHRISTOPHER M. SOUZA, and all others similarly situated. v. Pacific Bell Telephone Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2007at00603
Defendant:
Pacific Bell Telephone Company, Inc., AT & T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA, INC., SBC Communications, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER M. SOUZA, and all others similarly situated.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Robert Irving Frederickson v. Transport Workers Union of America AFL-CIO
as 2:2007cv03657
Plaintiff:
Robert Irving Frederickson
Defendant:
Transport Workers Union of America AFL-CIO Air Transport Division
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
