Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Jordan v. T.Y.P. Restaurant Group, Inc.
as 1:2024cv01617
Plaintiff:
Terrell Jordan
Defendant:
T.Y.P. Restaurant Group, Inc. and T.Y.P. Restaurant Group, Inc. doing business as Tender Greens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Smirensky v. The Mental Health Association of Columbia-Greene Counties, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00837
Plaintiff:
Maria Smirensky
Defendant:
The Mental Health Association of Columbia-Greene Counties, Inc. and Jeffrey Rovitz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Green v. Leslie's Poolmart, Inc.
as 2:2022cv03683
Plaintiff:
Robert Green
Defendant:
Leslie's Poolmart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
XCEL Inc v. The Pharm, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv02065
Defendant:
The Pharm, LLC, Green Thumb Management, L.L.C. and The Pharm, LLC doing business as Sunday Goods
Plaintiff:
XCEL Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Wesley et al v. The Catalyst Capital Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00376
Plaintiff:
Rasheena Wesley , Syreeta Wesley , Anklav Dwyer and others
Defendant:
The Catalyst Capital Group, Inc., Natural Markets Food Group, Natural Market Restaurant Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2100 WARN ACT
Priedemann v. Green Tech High Charter School et al
as 1:2013cv00805
Petitioner:
Christopher Priedemann
Respondent:
Green Tech High Charter School , Green Tech High Charter School Board of Trustees and Paul Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Mohawk Customs and Shipping Corp. v. Greene
as 5:2010cv01359
Plaintiff:
Mohawk Customs and Shipping Corp.
Defendant:
Jodie Greene
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hollis v. Hofstra University et al
as 2:2010cv01003
Defendant:
Jayne Brownell, Jennifer Boscorino Green and Hofstra University
Plaintiff:
Leah Hollis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
