Cases 1 - 10 of 2,523
PRESTES v. CAFE VICO, INC., et al
as 0:2024cv60852
Plaintiff:
MILTON PRESTES
Defendant:
CAFE VICO, INC., and VICO GALT OCEAN L.L.C. doing business as Cafe Vico
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Menezes v. Bank of America Corporation
as 3:2024cv00500
Plaintiff:
Samuel Menezes
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation
CUEVAS v. Grosvenor Building Services, LLC
as 6:2024cv00935
Plaintiff:
JOSE CUEVAS
Defendant:
Grosvenor Building Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
PRESTES v. CAFE VICO, INC., et al
as 0:2024cv60854
Plaintiff:
MILTON PRESTES
Defendant:
CAFE VICO, INC., and VICO GALT OCEAN L.L.C. doing business as Cafe Vico
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Lowe v. Red Lobster Hospitality LLC et al
as 6:2024cv00928
Plaintiff:
Donna Lowe
Defendant:
Red Lobster Hospitality LLC, Red Lobster Restaurants, LLC and Red Lobster Seafood Co., LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Williamson v. Florida Health Sciences Center, Inc.
as 8:2024cv01209
Plaintiff:
VONETTA WILLIAMSON
Defendant:
FLORIDA HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER, INC. d/b/a TAMPA GENERAL HOSPITAL
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0704 Labor Litigation
Pirela v. GIONI INCORPORATED
as 1:2024cv21902
Plaintiff:
Joseph Pirela
Defendant:
GIONI INCORPORATED
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
ROSEMARY v. BESTBET HOLDINGS, INC.
as 3:2024cv00473
Plaintiff:
QUINN ROSEMARY
Defendant:
BESTBET HOLDINGS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Andrews v. Cubesmart LP
as 2:2024cv00427
Plaintiff:
Erin Andrews
Defendant:
Cubesmart LP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
Floyd v. Highgate Hotels L.P.
as 1:2024cv21770
Plaintiff:
Contrell Leo Floyd
Defendant:
Highgate Hotels L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
