Cases 21 - 30 of 1,118
TRUSTEES OF THE B.A.C. LOCAL 5 PENSION FUND et al v. M&M CONSTRUCTION TECHNOLOGY, INC.
as 3:2023cv20542
Plaintiff:
TRUSTEES OF THE B.A.C. LOCAL 5 PENSION FUND, TRUSTEES OF THE NEW JERSEY B.A.C. ANNUITY FUND, TRUSTEES OF THE NEW JERSEY B.A.C. HEALTH FUND and others
Defendant:
M&M CONSTRUCTION TECHNOLOGY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
DISTRICT 1199J, NEW JERSEY HEALTH CARE EMPLOYERS PENSION FUND v. PRINCETON CARE CENTER et al
as 2:2023cv21403
Plaintiff:
DISTRICT 1199J, NEW JERSEY HEALTH CARE EMPLOYERS PENSION FUND
Defendant:
PRINCETON CARE CENTER, PRINCETON NURSING HOME & REHABILITATION CENTER, INC., GAIL BOGNER and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
TRUSTEES OF THE REFRIGERATION AIR CONDITIONING & SERVICE DIVISION (UA-NJ) PENSION FUND, WELFARE FUND, ANNUITY FUND, EDUCATION FUND, INDUSTRY FUND AND INTERNATIONAL TRAINING FUNDS et al v. 454 MECHANICAL LLC
as 2:2023cv20427
Plaintiff:
TRUSTEES OF THE REFRIGERATION AIR CONDITIONING & SERVICE DIVISION (UA-NJ) PENSION FUND, WELFARE FUND, ANNUITY FUND, EDUCATION FUND, INDUSTRY FUND AND INTERNATIONAL TRAINING FUNDS, REFRIGERATION, AIR CONDITIONING & SERVICE DIVISION (UA-NJ) PENSION FUND, WELFARE FUND, ANNUITY FUND, EDUCATION FUND, INDUSTRY FUND AND INTERNATIONAL TRAINING FUNDS and NEW JERSEY COMMITTEE REPRESENTING THE UNITED ASSOCIATION OF JOURNEYMEN AND APPRENTICES OF THE PLUMBING AND PIPE FITTING INDUSTRY OF THE UNITED STATES AND CANADA, AN UNINCORPORATED LABOR ORGANIZATION
Defendant:
454 MECHANICAL LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
BAKERY DRIVERS AND SALESMEN LOCAL 194 AND INDUSTRY PENSION FUNDS BY ITS BOARD OF TRUSTEES v. HALL
as 2:2023cv04128
Plaintiff:
BAKERY DRIVERS AND SALESMEN LOCAL 194 AND INDUSTRY PENSION FUNDS BY ITS BOARD OF TRUSTEES
Defendant:
KEITH HALL
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
TRUSTEES OF THE B.A.C. LOCAL 5 PENSION FUND et al v. M&M CONSTRUCTION TECHNOLOGY, INC.
as 2:2023cv20542
Plaintiff:
TRUSTEES OF THE B.A.C. LOCAL 5 PENSION FUND, TRUSTEES OF THE NEW JERSEY B.A.C. ANNUITY FUND, TRUSTEES OF THE NEW JERSEY B.A.C. HEALTH FUND and others
Defendant:
M&M CONSTRUCTION TECHNOLOGY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
IBEW LOCAL 269 HEALTH & WELFARE FUND et al v. ADVANTAGE ELECTRICAL SERVICES
as 3:2023cv13504
Plaintiff:
IBEW LOCAL 269 HEALTH & WELFARE FUND, IBEW LOCAL 269 PENSION FUND, IBEW LOCAL 269 ANNUITY FUND and others
Defendant:
ADVANTAGE ELECTRICAL SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
INTERNATIONAL PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES INDUSTRY PENSION FUND et al v. PURE GLASS LLC et al
as 2:2023cv03857
Plaintiff:
INTERNATIONAL PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES INDUSTRY PENSION FUND, INTERNATIONAL PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES ANNUITY PLAN, TERRY NELSON and others
Defendant:
PURE GLASS LLC and MATTHEW M. STAFFORD
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
TEAMSTERS INDUSTRIAL EMPLOYEES PENSION FUND BY ITS BOARD OF TRUSTEES v. PISCITELLI
as 2:2023cv06096
Plaintiff:
TEAMSTERS INDUSTRIAL EMPLOYEES PENSION FUND BY ITS BOARD OF TRUSTEES
Defendant:
EMILIA PISCITELLI
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
INTERNATIONAL PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES INDUSTRY PENSION FUND et al v. IMPACT STOREFRONT DESIGNS LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY et al
as 2:2023cv03581
Plaintiff:
FINISHING TRADES INSTITUTE, INTERNATIONAL PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES INDUSTRY PENSION FUND, INTERNATIONAL PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES ANNUITY PLAN and others
Defendant:
IMPACT STOREFRONT DESIGNS LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY and MICHAEL P. MASTERSON
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
I.U.O.E. LOCAL 68 PENSION FUND et al v. HIGHGATE HOTELS, LP
as 2:2023cv03589
Plaintiff:
IUOE LOCAL 68 PENSION FUND, I.U.O.E. LOCAL 68 PENSION FUND and MICHAEL MCGLYNN
Defendant:
HIGHGATE HOTELS LP and HIGHGATE HOTELS, LP
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
