Cases 51 - 60 of 286
MARTIN v. HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2022cv00096
Plaintiff:
KRISTA MARTIN
Defendant:
HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
BURKE v. PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 2:2022cv00093
Plaintiff:
AMY BURKE
Defendant:
PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
BUTLER v. LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
as 2:2022cv00072
Plaintiff:
DONNA BUTLER
Defendant:
LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
LEBLANC v. PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 2:2022cv00066
Plaintiff:
DANIEL LEBLANC
Defendant:
PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
CARBUCCIA v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 2:2022cv00042
Plaintiff:
BRENDA CARBUCCIA
Defendant:
UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
BURILA v. LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
as 2:2021cv00332
Plaintiff:
FRANCISCO B BURILA, JR
Defendant:
CIGNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA and LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
BURKE v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 2:2021cv00325
Plaintiff:
THOMAS BURKE
Defendant:
UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
COOLIDGE v. RELIANCE STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2021cv00289
Plaintiff:
JULIE COOLIDGE
Defendant:
RELIANCE STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
KOZEMCHAK v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 2:2021cv00237
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH KOZEMCHAK
Defendant:
UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
BOUCHER v. HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE CO
as 2:2021cv00217
Plaintiff:
JOHN G BOUCHER
Defendant:
HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE CO
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1451
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
