Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 Cases filed in New Jersey
JACKSON v. HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2018cv13933
Plaintiff: CATHERINE JACKSON
Defendant: HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY, THE, HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY and THE HARTFORD
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. JACKSON et al
as 1:2017cv00340
Plaintiff: METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant: RUSSELL JACKSON, JR. and PATRICIA JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
JACKSON v. HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSRUANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2009cv00422
Plaintiff: RICHARD JACKSON
Defendant: HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSRUANCE COMPANY and FEDEX FREIGHT EAST INC. GROUP BENEFIT PLAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Type: Labor None
BLOOD et al v. EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY, ET AL We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2008cv06123
Plaintiff: JEFFREY C. BLOOD, NICHOLAS J. TUFANO, FREDERICK ALTRIETH and others
Defendant: EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY, KODAK RETIREMENT INCOME PLAN and KODAK RETIREMENT INCOME PLAN COMMITTEE
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Labor None
LAMBRIGHT et al v. LUCENT RETIREMENT INCOME PLAN, THE et al
as 2:2007cv00468
Plaintiff: TERRY LAMBRIGHT and JAMES JACKSON
Defendant: LUCENT RETIREMENT INCOME PLAN, THE, THE PLAN COMMITTE AND ADMINISTRATIOR OF THE LUCENT RETIREMENT INCOME PLAN and LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?