Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Floyd vs Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
as 1:2019cv20164
Plaintiff:
David Floyd
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Floyd v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America
as 1:2016cv23439
Plaintiff:
Alan R. Floyd
Defendant:
The Prudential Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Floyd v. Life Insurance Company of North America
as 1:2013cv23245
Plaintiff:
Lynnette Floyd
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Solis v. Seibert
as 8:2009cv01726
Plaintiff:
Hilda L. Solis
Defendant:
Floyd W. Seibert
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
In Re: MDL - 1698 American General Life & Accident Insurance Co. Retiree Benefits ERISA litigation
as 3:2005md01698
Defendant:
American General Life & Accident Insurance Company, American General Life & Accident Insurance Company and American General Life & Accident Insurance Company
Consol Plaintiff:
Eleanor M. Acres, Eleanor M. Acres, Eleanor M. Acres and others
Consol Third Party Plaintiff:
American General Life and Accident Insurance Co., American General Life and Accident Insurance Company, American General Life and Accident Insurance Company and others
Consol Third Party Defendant:
John H. Askew, Jr., John H. Askew, Jr., John H. Askew, Jr. and others
Consol Defendant:
Oliver H. Bunton, Jr. and Aldora J. Thompson
Consol Counter Claimant:
American General Life and Accident Insurance Company
Consol Counter Defendant:
Raymond L. Addison and Raymond L. Addison
Mediator:
Terrence M. White
Counter Claimant:
American General Life & Accident Insurance Company and American General Life & Accident Insurance Company
Counter Defendant:
W.L. Boyd, W.L. Boyd, W.L. Boyd and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
