Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Armstrong et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Texas
as 3:2023cv01858
Plaintiff:
Bob Armstrong and Luke Armstrong
Defendant:
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Trustmark Health Benefits, Inc. v. St. Luke's Health System Corporation, et al
as 4:2021cv02477
Plaintiff:
Trustmark Health Benefits, Inc. and CoreSource, Inc.
Defendant:
ST. LUKES HEALTH SYSTEM CORPORATION d/b/a St. Lukes The Woodlands Hospital and St. Luke's Health System Corporation doing business as St. Luke's The Woodlands Hospital
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Rados v. St. Luke's Health System Corporation et al
as 4:2020cv03352
Defendant:
Fidelity Investments Institutional Operations Company, LLC, CommonSpirit Health and St. Luke's Health System Corporation
Plaintiff:
Kresimir Rados
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
True View Surgery Center One, L.P. et al v. MILA National Health Plan et al
as 4:2016cv01648
Defendant:
MILA National Health Plan, David F Adam, Benny Holland and others
Plaintiff:
True View Surgery Center One, L.P, True View Surgery Center One, L.P., Oprex Surgery (Houston), LP and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
St. Luke's Health System Corporation v. AT&T Employee Benefit Plan
as 4:2014cv00407
Plaintiff:
St. Luke's Health System Corporation
Defendant:
AT&T Employee Benefit Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital v. One Health Plan of Texas, Inc. et al
as 4:2008cv01773
Defendant:
One Health Plan of Texas, Inc., Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Company, CCC Interactive Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
White v. St. Luke's Episcopal Health System
as 4:2007cv03771
Plaintiff:
Chava White
Defendant:
St. Luke's Episcopal Health System
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
