Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Department of Labor v. Day-Mont Behavioral Health Care, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00242
Defendant:
Akil Sharif, Individual, Gayle Johnson, Individual, Day-Mont Behavioral Health Care Inc. Employee Benefit Plan and others
Plaintiff:
Secretary of Labor R. Alexander Acosta and Thomas E. Perez Department of Labor
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Perez v. Lechler et al
as 2:2017cv00060
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
Michael A. Lechler, Exterior Systems, Inc. and Exterior Systems, Inc. 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Secretary of Labor Thomas E Perez v. Hufgard et al
as 5:2014cv01456
Defendant:
John W. Hufgard and Universal Custom Process Inc. 401(k) Retirement Plan
Plaintiff:
Thomas E Perez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Perez v Anesthesia & Pain Center of Akron, Inc., et al
as 5:2014cv00366
Plaintiff:
Thomas E Perez
Defendant:
Anesthesia & Pain Center of Akron, Inc., Frank Kousaie and Anesthesia & Pain Center of Akron, Inc. 401(k) and Profit Sharing Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109
Perez v. Hayes et al
as 5:2014cv00193
Plaintiff:
Thomas E Perez
Defendant:
Clark V Hayes, Applied Technology Systems, Inc. Retirement Plan and Applied Technology Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Perez v. Snyder et al
as 1:2013cv02474
Plaintiff:
Thomas E Perez
Defendant:
Charles David Snyder, Joseph Burmester, Cirric Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Perez v. Deighan et al
as 1:2013cv02398
Plaintiff:
Thomas E Perez
Defendant:
Daniel Deighan, Timothy Deighan, Sunset Golf, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Perez v. Polaris America LLC et al
as 2:2013cv00749
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
Polaris America LLC, Polaris America, LLC 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan and Christopher Filos
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
