Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 48
HUDSON HOSPITAL OPCO, LLC et al v. CIGNA HEALTH AND LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv04964
Plaintiff: HUDSON HOSPITAL OPCO, LLC, IJKG, LLC, IJKG PROPCO LLC and others
Defendant: CIGNA HEALTH AND LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and CONNECTICUT GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
HUDSON HOSPITAL OPCO, LLC et al v. AETNA HEALTH INC. et al
as 2:2022cv04373
Plaintiff: HUDSON HOSPITAL OPCO, LLCd/b/a CAREPOINT HEALTHCHRIST HOSPITAL, IJKG, LLC; IJKG PROPCO LLC and IJKG OPCO LLC d/b/a CAREPOINT HEALTHBAYONNE MEDICAL CENTER, HUMC OPCO LLC d/b/a CAREPOINT HEALTH HOBOKEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER and others
Defendant: AETNA HEALTH INC., AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and AETNA LIFE INSURANCE CO.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Barcenas et al v. Rush University Medical Center et al
as 1:2022cv00366
Plaintiff: John Barcenas, Mary Brown, Patrick Russo and others
Defendant: Rush University Medical Center, The Board of Trustees of Rush University Medical Center, The Rush University Medical Center Investment Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1104 Recovery of Benefits to Employee
Rush University Medical Center, Inc. v. Mutual Medical Plans, Inc., et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv03697
Plaintiff: Rush University Medical Center, Inc. ( an Illinois corporation) and Rush University Medical Center
Defendant: Mutual Medical Plans, Inc. and Does 1 through 25, Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HACKENSACK UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER v. JOAN MATUSCHEWITZ et al
as 2:2020cv00434
3Rd Party Plaintiff: JOAN MATUSCHEWITZ
Plaintiff: HACKENSACK UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER
3Rd Party Defendant: BOARD OF TRUSTEES, TRUCKING EMPLOYEES OF NORTH JERSEY WELFARE FUND, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Riphagen v. Carepoint Health - Hoboken University Medical Center
as 1:2019cv01286
Plaintiff: Margot Riphagen
Defendant: Carepoint Health - Hoboken University Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Lucherini Blakesley Courtney, P.C. v. Baer et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv00611
Defendant: Athletic & Therapeutic Institute of Naperville, LLC, Cindi Baer, Brian A. Lemper, D.O., Ltd. and others
Plaintiff: Lucherini Blakesley Courtney, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Key Insurance Company v. Taylor et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv02388
Defendant: Maria Alma-Delia, Melody Castillo, Julio Davila and others
Plaintiff: Key Insurance Company
Cross Defendant: Stacy Taylor
Cross Claimant: Unite Here Health
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
The Law Offices of Chad M. Golightly v. Morales et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv01589
Cross Defendant: American Medical Response of Southern California, Auxiliary of Riverside Community Hospital, Mark Glyman and others
Defendant: American Medical Response of Southern California, Auxiliary of Riverside Community Hospital, Mark Glyman and others
Counter Defendant: The Law Offices of Chad M. Golightly, Ltd.
Plaintiff: The Law Offices of Chad M. Golightly, Ltd.
Counter Claimant: Unite Here Health
Cross Claimant: Unite Here Health
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Eric Palacios & Associates, Ltd. v. Mendez et al
as 2:2015cv00779
Cross Defendant: City of Las Vegas Fire & Rescue, Rolando Mendez, Southern Nevada Medical Group, Ltd. and others
Defendant: City of Las Vegas Fire & Rescue, Rolando Mendez, Southern Nevada Medical Group, Ltd. and others
Counter Defendant: Eric Palacios & Associates, Ltd.
Plaintiff: Eric Palacios & Associates, Ltd.
Counter Claimant: Unite Here Health
Cross Claimant: Unite Here Health
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?