Cases 101 - 110 of 493
Causey's Pharmacy Inc et al v. Praeses L L C
as 1:2017cv01391
Plaintiff:
Causeys Pharmacy Inc , Steven T Boyd and LeAnn Causey Boyd
Defendant:
Praeses L L C
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Real et al v. Matteo
as 6:2017cv01288
Plaintiff:
Michael Real and Fancy Hat Studios Inc
Defendant:
Devescovi Matteo
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Escanelle v. Golden Griffin Publishing, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv10181
Plaintiff:
Gustavo Escanelle
Defendant:
Golden Griffin Publishing, LLC and Earnest Steven Martin
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Roday Productions, LLC v. Krannel Pictures, LLC et al
as 3:2017cv00691
Defendant:
Mychal Bell, Krannel Pictures, LLC and Dawn Krantz
Plaintiff:
Roday Productions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Ross v. Warner Brothers Pictures Co et al
as 1:2017cv01130
Plaintiff:
Ira Jerome Ross
Defendant:
Warner Brothers Pictures Co and Kevin Tsujihara
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Broadcast Music, Inc. et al v. Lacy's Cue, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv07583
Plaintiff:
Broadcast Music, Inc. , Sony/ATV Songs LLC , 3Ring Circus Music, LLC and others
Defendant:
Lacy's Cue, LLC and Frank Haines
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Express Lien, Inc. v. Dar-Liens, Inc., et al
as 2:2017cv05056
Plaintiff:
Express Lien Inc
Defendant:
Dar-Liens, Inc. and Unidentified Party
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Batiste v. Lewis et al
as 2:2017cv04435
Defendant:
Ryan Lewis, Ben Haggerty, Macklemore Publishing and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Batiste
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Express Lien Inc v. Expressliens USA, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv02871
Plaintiff:
Express Lien Inc
Defendant:
Expressliens USA, Inc., Nickolas B. Santos and Unidentified Party
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Three Threads LLC v. Lanier
as 3:2017cv00174
Defendant:
Samantha Lanier
Plaintiff:
Three Threads LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
