Cases 41 - 50 of 17,695
Makkai et al v. Databricks, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv02653
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Makkai and Jason Reynolds
Defendant:
Databricks, Inc. and Mosaic ML, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Dubus et al v. NVIDIA Corporation
as 4:2024cv02655
Plaintiff:
Andre Dubus, III and Susan Orlean
Defendant:
NVIDIA Corporation
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Covey v. Melanie Grant Skin Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03652
Plaintiff:
Troy Covey
Defendant:
Melanie Grant Skin Inc. and Does 1 through 10 inclusive,
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Jennifer Black v. Aeticon LLC et al
as 2:2024cv03642
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Black
Defendant:
Aeticon LLC, Wenyu Cai and DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
ONan et al v. Databricks, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv01451
Plaintiff:
Stewart ONan, Abdi Nazemian and Brian Keene
Defendant:
Databricks, Inc. and Mosaic ML, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Evas Photography, Inc. v. Daniel Sergio Hudson
as 2:2024cv01879
Plaintiff:
Eva's Photography, Inc. and Evas Photography, Inc.
Defendant:
Daniel Sergio Hudson
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Helayne Seidman v. Transom Capital Group, LLC
as 2:2024cv01937
Plaintiff:
Helayne Seidman
Defendant:
Transom Capital Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00540
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101 Copyright Infringement (definitions)
Strauss v. Superbloom Style LLC
as 5:2024cv01341
Plaintiff:
Myra Strauss
Defendant:
Superbloom Style LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Brandon Vogts v. Edvin Pirverdian et al
as 2:2024cv03581
Plaintiff:
Brandon Vogts
Defendant:
Edvin Pirverdian and DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
