Copyrights Cases filed in California
Cases 51 - 60 of 61
LA Printex Industries, Inc. v. Belk, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv03286
Plaintiff: LA Printex Industries, Inc. and LA Printex Industries, Inc.
Defendant: Belk, Inc., Belk, Inc., Around the World Apparel, Inc. and others
Counter Defendant: ROES and LA Printex Industries, Inc.
Counter Claimant: Around the World Apparel, Inc., Around the World Apparel, Inc. and Around the World Apparel, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Dreamroom Productions, Inc. v. John Doe # 1 et al
as 2:2009cv02583
Plaintiff: Dreamroom Productions, Inc. and Dreamroom Productions, Inc.
Defendant: John Doe # 1, John Doe #2, John Doe #3 and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Beyond Electronics Inc. v. Emax Wireless, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv01926
Plaintiff: Beyond Electronics Inc.
Defendant: Emax Wireless, Inc., Emax Wireless, Inc., Emax Wireless, Inc. and others
Counter Defendant: Roes and Beyond Electronics Inc.
Counter Claimant: Emax Wireless, Inc., Emax Wireless, Inc., Emax Wireless, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
ATI Industries, Inc v. Art and Frame Mart Corporation et al
as 3:2008cv01296
Plaintiff: ATI Industries, Inc
Defendant: Art and Frame Mart Corporation, DOES and ROES
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hearst Holdings Inc et al v. David Kim et al
as 2:2007cv04642
Plaintiff: Hearst Holdings Inc, King Features Syndicated Division and Fleischer Studios Inc
Defendant: David Kim, Midas Touch, Ki Soo Kim and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Third World Media LLC v. Ideamax Corp et al
as 2:2007cv01638
Plaintiff: Third World Media LLC
Defendant: Ideamax Corp and Does
ThirdParty Plaintiff: Ideamax Corp
ThirdParty Defendant: Alante International Sales Inc, Alante International Sales Inc and Roes 1 to 10, inclusive
Counter Claimant: Alante International Sales Inc and Alante International Sales Inc
Counter Defendant: Ideamax Corp
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
DKAdvisors Holdings et al v. DeGregori et al
as 8:2007cv00205
Plaintiff: DKAdvisors Holdings
Defendant: DeGregori, Vertical Advisors, Lindt Truong and others
Counter Claimant: DeGregori and Peter DeGregori
Counter Defendant: Robert Deines, Ann K. Mathis, ROES 1 through 10 and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
United Fabrics International Inc v. Forever 21 Inc et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2007cv00800
Plaintiff: United Fabrics International Inc, United Fabrics International Inc and United Fabrics International Inc
Defendant: Forever 21 Inc, Forever 21 Retail Inc, Salt and Pepper Clothing Inc and others
Cross Claimant: Salt and Pepper Clothing Inc
Cross Defendant: Neman Brothers Association Inc and Roes 1-10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Adam Pick v. Fremantlemedia North America Inc et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2007cv00728
Plaintiff: Adam Pick and Adam Pick
Defendant: Fremantlemedia North America Inc, Fremantlemedia North America Inc, American Idol Productions Inc and others
Cross Claimant: American Idol Productions Inc, American Idol Productions Inc, Fremantlemedia North America Inc and others
Cross Defendant: Roes and Adam Pick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
SST Records Inc v. Gary McDaniel
as 2:2007cv00376
Plaintiff: SST Records Inc and SST Records Inc
Defendant: Gary McDaniel and Gary McDaniel
Counter Claimant: Gary McDaniel and Gary McDaniel
Counter Defendant: SST Records Inc and SST Records Inc
ThirdParty Plaintiff: Gary McDaniel and Gary McDaniel
ThirdParty Defendant: Greg Ginn and Roes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?