Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Pearson Education, Inc. et al v. Dong et al
as 3:2022mc80186
Plaintiff:
Pearson Education, Inc., John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Cengage Learning Inc. and others
Defendant:
Zhiming Dong agent of D/B/A LANPIN08 agent of D/B/A MING1015 and Xiaodong Zhang agent of D/B/A LANPIN08 agent of NICK ZHANG
Tim Laman v. Pearson Education, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv04630
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc., Barnes & Noble Booksellers, Inc., DOES 1 through 10 and others
Plaintiff:
Tim Laman
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Tarren Pearson v. LULAROE, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv06265
Defendant:
LULAROE, LLC and DOES 1 through 10
Plaintiff:
Tarren Pearson
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
McGraw-Hill Global Education Holdings, LLC et al v. Stolyarchuk
as 2:2017cv01716
Plaintiff:
McGraw-Hill Global Education Holdings, LLC , Pearson Education, Inc. and Cengage Learning, Inc.
Defendant:
Yaroslav Stolyarchuk
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
McGraw-Hill Global Education Holdings, LLC et al v. Stolyarchuk
as 2:2017at00849
Plaintiff:
McGraw-Hill Global Education Holdings, LLC , Pearson Education, Inc. and Cengage Learning, Inc.
Defendant:
Yaroslav Stolyarchuk
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Joseph Sohm v. Pearson Education, Inc.
as 2:2016cv02546
Defendant:
Pearson Education, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Joseph Sohm
Menzel v. Pearson Education, Inc.
as 3:2016cv01949
Plaintiff:
Peter Menzel
Defendant:
Pearson Education, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Wild v. Pearson Pest Control, Inc.
as 1:2015at00989
Plaintiff:
Alexander L. Wild
Defendant:
Pearson Pest Control, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504
Buffy Lyn Roney et al v. Michael Miller et al
as 2:2015cv09652
Defendant:
And/Or Press, And/Or Press, Incorporated, Doe Corporations and others
Plaintiff:
Patricia De Somma, Patrick De Somma, Paul De Somma and others
Edwina Talley v. John Eck et al
as 2:2014cv07568
Defendant:
Toby Bloom, John Eck, Shirley Eck and others
Plaintiff:
Edwina Talley
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
