Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Carl Zeiss X-Ray Microscopy, Inc. v. Sigray, Inc.
as 5:2021cv01129
Plaintiff:
Carl Zeiss X-Ray Microscopy, Inc.
Defendant:
Sigray, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Wilson Sporting Goods Co. v. Monsta Athletics, LLC et al
as 5:2019cv00738
Plaintiff:
Wilson Sporting Goods Co.
Defendant:
Monsta Athletics, LLC and Carl Pegnatori
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Carl Zeiss SMT GmbH v. Nikon Research Corporation of America et al
as 5:2018cv04403
Plaintiff:
Carl Zeiss SMT GmbH
Defendant:
Nikon Research Corporation of America , Nikon Corporation and Nikon Precision Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Carl Zeiss SMT GmbH v. Nikon Research Corporation of America et al
as 3:2018cv04403
Defendant:
Nikon Precision Inc., Nikon Corporation and Nikon Research Corporation of America
Plaintiff:
Carl Zeiss SMT GmbH
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Carl Zeiss AG et al v. Nikon Corporation et al
as 2:2017cv03225
Plaintiff:
ASML Netherlands B.V. and Carl Zeiss AG
Defendant:
Nikon Corporation, Nikon Inc. and Sendai Nikon Corporation
Carl Zeiss et al v. Nikon Corporation et al
as 2:2017cv03221
Plaintiff:
ASML Netherlands B.V. and Carl Zeiss
Defendant:
Nikon Corporation, Nikon Inc. and Sendai Nikon Corporation
SungKyunKwan University, Research and Business Foundation v. Carl Zeiss, Inc.
as 3:2016cv06965
Plaintiff:
SungKyunKwan University, Research and Business Foundation
Defendant:
Carl Zeiss, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
ungKyunKwan University, Research and Business Foundation v. Carl Zeiss, Inc.
as 3:2016cv06964
Plaintiff:
ungKyunKwan University, Research and Business Foundation
Defendant:
Carl Zeiss, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Joseph Neev v. Carl Zeiss Meditec Inc et al
as 8:2015cv01996
Defendant:
Carl Zeiss Meditec AG and Carl Zeiss Meditec Inc
Plaintiff:
Joseph Neev
Femto Sec Tech Inc v. Carl Zeiss Meditec Inc
as 8:2015cv01692
Defendant:
Carl Zeiss Meditec Inc
Plaintiff:
Femto Sec Tech Inc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
