Cases 31 - 38 of 38
FUJI HEAVY INDUSTRIES LTD. et al v. NATIONAL AUTO WARRANTY SERVICES,INC. et al
as 2:2009cv00070
Plaintiff:
FUJI HEAVY INDUSTRIES LTD. and SUBARU OF AMERICA, INC.
Defendant:
NATIONAL AUTO WARRANTY SERVICES,INC. doing business as DEALER SERVICES and NATIONAL DEALERS WARRANTY,INC. doing business as NATIONAL DEALERS WARRANTY
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
NATURALAWN OF AMERICA, INC. v. NATURALAWN, INC.
as 1:2009cv02216
Plaintiff:
NATURALAWN OF AMERICA, INC.
Defendant:
NATURALAWN, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
GUCCI AMERICA, INC. v. MIRABELLA et al
as 2:2009cv00712
Plaintiff:
GUCCI AMERICA, INC.
Defendant:
DOMINICK J. MIRABELLA and DOES 1 THROUGH 10
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SAN PELLEGRINO S.p.A. et al v. AGGRESSIVE PARTNERSHIPS, INC. et al
as 1:2008cv06016
Plaintiff:
SAN PELLEGRINO S.p.A. and NESTLE WATERS NORTH AMERICA, INC.
Defendant:
AGGRESSIVE PARTNERSHIPS, INC., JOHN BARSOLI, MARK DEGEORGE and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
SPECIFIED TECHNOLOGIES v. HILTI, INC. et al
as 3:2008cv03552
Plaintiff:
SPECIFIED TECHNOLOGIES
Defendant:
HILTI, INC. and HILTI OF AMERICA, INC.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
NESTLE WATERS NORTH AMERICA INC. v. JOHN DOES NO. 1-20
as 1:2007cv02988
Plaintiff:
NESTLE WATERS NORTH AMERICA INC.
Defendant:
JOHN DOES NO. 1-20
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
MOVON CORPORATION et al v. ROADMASTER (USA) CORP. et al
as 3:2007cv01983
Plaintiff:
MOVON CORPORATION and MOVON AMERICA, INC.
Defendant:
ROADMASTER (USA) CORP., GREAT WELL ELECTRONIC, LTD. and JOHN DOE 1-25
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
VSM GROUP AB v. JANOME AMERICA, INC.
as 2:2007cv00399
Plaintiff:
VSM GROUP AB and VSM GROUP AB
Defendant:
JANOME AMERICA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
