Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Global Merchandising Services, Ltd. et al v. Various John Does, Jane Does and ABC Companies
as 1:2022cv02242
Plaintiff:
Global Merchandising Services, Ltd., Motley Crue, Inc., Merch Traffic, LLC and others
Defendant:
Various John Does, Jane Does and ABC Companies
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Trademark Infringement
Phish, Inc. v. Various John Does, Jane Does and XYZ Corporations
as 1:2021cv02982
Plaintiff:
Phish, Inc., Scott Bohac, Carrie Berg and others
Defendant:
Various John Does, Jane Does and XYZ Corporations
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Riley et al v. Hannibal et al
as 1:2016cv02544
Plaintiff:
Edward T. Riley, Sr. and Blackstreet Entertainment, Inc. (Blackstreet)
Defendant:
Chauncey Hannibal , Doe Corporation 1-10 and John and Jane Doe 1-5
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Hi-Tech Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Advanced Nutraceutical Sciences, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv01538
Plaintiff:
Hi-Tech Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Defendant:
Advanced Nutraceutical Sciences, Inc., John and Jane Does 1-10 and John Doe Entities 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Crazy Horse Licensing, Inc. v. Galardi South Enterprises Consulting, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv01228
Plaintiff:
Crazy Horse Licensing, Inc.
Defendant:
Galardi South Enterprises Consulting, Inc., Red Eyed, Inc., JGP&P, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Hi-Tech Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Kerlegan Pharmaceutical Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv03962
Plaintiff:
Hi-Tech Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Defendant:
Kerlegan Pharmaceutical Group, Inc., Bioformx Nutrition, Inc., Jeff Kerlegan and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Tracfone Wireless, Inc. v. GCA Electronics, LLC et al
as 1:2007cv03084
Plaintiff:
Tracfone Wireless, Inc. and Tracfone Wireless, Inc.
Defendant:
GCA Electronics, LLC, GCA Electronics, LLC, Gunawan Lie and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
