Cases 11 - 20 of 70
O'Dell v. MoneyGram International, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv02721
Plaintiff:
Ryan O'Dell
Defendant:
MoneyGram International, Inc., W. Alexander Holmes, Amb. Antonio O. Garza and others
BAKER v. ZURN WATER SOLUTIONS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2022cv01629
Plaintiff:
LEWIS D BAKER
Defendant:
ZURN WATER SOLUTIONS CORPORATION, TODD A ADAMS, MARK S BARTLETT and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Whitfield v. Zurn Water Solutions Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv02307
Plaintiff:
Matthew Whitfield
Defendant:
Zurn Water Solutions Corporation, Todd A. Adams, Mark S. Bartlett and others
WATERMAN v. MONEYGRAM INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv01399
Plaintiff:
MARC WATERMAN
Defendant:
MONEYGRAM INTERNATIONAL, INC., W ALEXANDER HOLMES, ANTONIO O GARZA and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Baker v. MoneyGram International, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01971
Plaintiff:
Lewis D. Baker
Defendant:
MoneyGram International, Inc., W. Alexander Holmes, Antonio O. Garza and others
Stein v. MoneyGram International, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv02634
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
Defendant:
MoneyGram International, Inc., W. Alexander Holmes, Amb. Antonio O. Garza and others
Green v. Umpqua Holdings Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv06729
Plaintiff:
Mike Green
Defendant:
Umpqua Holdings Corporation, Peggy Y. Fowler, Cort Lane OHaver and others
Mackie v. Umpqua Holdings Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv10237
Plaintiff:
Keith Mackie
Defendant:
Umpqua Holdings Corporation, Peggy Yvonne Fowler, Bryan L. Timm and others
Wang v. Umpqua Holdings Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv10143
Plaintiff:
Elaine Wang
Defendant:
Umpqua Holdings Corporation, Peggy Yvonne Fowler, Bryan L. Timm and others
CICCOTELLI v. UMPQUA HOLDINGS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2021cv05610
Plaintiff:
ALEX CICCOTELLI
Defendant:
UMPQUA HOLDINGS CORPORATION, PEGGY YVONNE FLOWER, BRYAN L TIMM and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
