Cases 31 - 40 of 9,403
Ubhi v. Leverton et al
as 1:2024cv02995
Plaintiff:
Maghar Ubhi
Defendant:
Jaime Leverton, Shenif Visram, Bill Tai and others
Gallatin v. McGrath RentCorp et al
as 1:2024cv02960
Plaintiff:
David Gallatin
Defendant:
McGrath RentCorp, Joseph F. Hanna, Nicolas C. Anderson and others
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Feller et al
as 1:2024cv02896
Plaintiff:
United States Securities and Exchange Commisison and Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Paul Feller and Icaro Media Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Bandari v. QED Connect, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02967
Plaintiff:
Jalandher Bandari
Defendant:
QED Connect, Inc., Nanny Katharina Bahnsen and David Rumbold
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Beisner v. Perion Network Ltd. et al
as 1:2024cv02860
Plaintiff:
Craig Beisner
Defendant:
Perion Network Ltd., Doron Gerstel, Tal Jacobson and others
Comeau v. VinFast Auto Ltd. et al
as 1:2024cv02750
Plaintiff:
Jeremie Comeau
Defendant:
VinFast Auto Ltd., Le Thi Thu Thuy, Pham Nhat Vuong and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Collins v. Masonite International Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv02779
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Collins
Defendant:
Masonite International Corporation, Robert J. Byrne, Howard C. Heckes and others
Ayers v. Shashua et al
as 1:2024cv02791
Plaintiff:
Patrick Ayers
Defendant:
Amnon Shashua, Eyal Desheh, Patrick P. Gelsinger and others
Bristol County Retirement System v. QuidelOrtho Corporation f/k/a Quidel Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv02804
Plaintiff:
Bristol County Retirement System
Defendant:
QuidelOrtho Corporation f/k/a Quidel Corporation, Douglas Bryant, Joseph Busky and others
IN RE BRAINSTORM CELL THERAPEUTICS, INC. DERIVATIVE LITIGATION
as 1:2024cv02811
Plaintiff:
John Duncan Hamby
Defendant:
Chaim Lebovits, Stacy Lindborg, June S. Almenoff and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
