Cases 41 - 50 of 67
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Daniel R. Adams et al
as 2:2019cv01412
Defendant:
Daniel Adams, An L.A. Minute, LLC, Spiderworx Media, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Sunil Kumar v. Mindbody Inc et al
as 2:2019cv00839
Defendant:
Adam Miller, Cipora Herman, Court Cunningham and others
Plaintiff:
Sunil Kumar
Gina Tran v. Mindbody Inc et al
as 2:2019cv00638
Defendant:
Adam Miller, Cipora Herman, Court Cunningham and others
Plaintiff:
Gina Tran
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wicks v. Alphabet, Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv06245
Defendant:
Alphabet, Inc., Ruth M. Porat, Lawrence E. Page and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Wicks
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
ACS Custom USA, LLC et al v. Adam Rhodes
as 2:2018cv08426
Plaintiff:
ACS Custom USA, LLC, 1of1 Custom, LLC and Dennis Lee
Defendant:
Adam Rhodes
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Adam Vignola v. FAT Brands, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv07469
Plaintiff:
Adam Vignola
Defendant:
Andrew A. Wiederhorn, TriPoint Global Equities, LLC, Edward H. Rensi and others
Petitioner:
David Kovacs, Charles Jordan and Randy Siade
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Franchi v. 8point3 Energy Partners LP et al
as 3:2018cv02549
Plaintiff:
Adam Franchi
Defendant:
8Point3 Energy Partners LP , Charles D. Boynton , Mark R Widmar and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Golosiy v. Tintri, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv05876
Plaintiff:
Vladimir Golosiy
Defendant:
Tintri, Inc. , Ken Klein , Kieran Harty and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Nurlybayev v. Tintri, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv05684
Plaintiff:
Rustem Nurlybayev
Defendant:
Tintri, Inc. , Ken Klein , Ian Halifax and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Clayton v. Tintri, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv05683
Plaintiff:
Laurence Clayton
Defendant:
Tintri, Inc. , Ken Klein , Ian Halifax and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
