Cases 41 - 50 of 145
WHITFIELD v. NET ELEMENT, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv03615
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WHITFIELD
Defendant:
NET ELEMENT, INC., OLEG FIRER, JON NAJARIAN and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
WHITFIELD v. QTS REALTY TRUST, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv03609
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WHITFIELD
Defendant:
QTS REALTY TRUST, INC., CHAD WILLIAMS, PHILIP P TRAHANAS and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
WATERMAN v. DOMTAR CORPORATION et al
as 2:2021cv03164
Plaintiff:
MARC WATERMAN
Defendant:
DOMTAR CORPORATION, ROBERT E APPLE, GIANNELLA ALVAREZ and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
WATERMAN v. SOUTHWESTERN ENERGY COMPANY et al
as 2:2021cv03628
Plaintiff:
MARC WATERMAN
Defendant:
SOUTHWESTERN ENERGY COMPANY, CATHERINE A KEHR, JOHN D GASS and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
WATERMAN v. AT HOME GROUP INC. et al
as 2:2021cv02956
Defendant:
LARRY D STONE, KENNETH SIMRIL, LEWIS L BIRD III and others
Plaintiff:
MARC WATERMAN
WHITFIELD v. MSG NETWORKS INC. et al
as 2:2021cv02868
Defendant:
HANK J RATNER, JOEL M LITVIN, STEPHEN MILLS and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WHITFIELD
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
WHITFIELD v. KNOLL, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv02776
Defendant:
RON KASS, CHRISTOPHER G KENNEDY, ANDREW B COGAN and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WHITFIELD
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
WATERMAN v. CHIASMA, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv03127
Plaintiff:
MARC WATERMAN
Defendant:
CHIASMA, INC., DAVID STACK, RAJ KANNAN and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
CECH v. MILLENDO THERAPEUTICS, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv02158
Defendant:
CAROLE NUECHTERLEIN, JAMES HINDMAN, TEMPEST THERAPEUTICS, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID CECH
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
TATE v. PEOPLE'S UNITED FINANCIAL, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv02030
Defendant:
PEOPLE'S UNITED FINANCIAL, INC., JERRY FRANKLIN, JANE CHWICK and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN TATE
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
