Cases 41 - 50 of 85
IN RE SEMILEDS CORPORATION LITIGATION
as 1:2013cv04776
Plaintiff:
Jean C. Huard
Defendant:
Semileds Corporation , Trung T. Doan , Anh Chuong Tran and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Cha v. Kinross Gold Corporation et al
as 1:2012cv01203
Plaintiff:
Bo Young Cha
Defendant:
Kinross Gold Corporation , Tye W. Burt , Paul H. Barry and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Young v. Sinotech Energy Limited et al
as 1:2011cv06179
Plaintiff:
John Young
Defendant:
Sinotech Energy Limited, Guoqiang Xin, Boxun Zhang and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Schron et al v. Ernst & Young LLP et al
as 1:2011cv05112
Plaintiff:
Avi Schron and Adina Schron
Defendant:
Ernst & Young LLP, Richard S. Fuld, Jr. and Christopher M. O'Meara
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Fifty-Ninth Street Investors LLC et al v. Ernst & Young LLP et al
as 1:2011cv04278
Plaintiff:
Fifty-Ninth Street Investors LLC and Arthur N. Abbey
Defendant:
Ernst & Young LLP, Richard S. Fuld, Jr. and Christopher M. O'Meara
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Starr International U.S.A. Investments LC et al v. Ernst & Young, LLP
as 1:2011cv03745
Plaintiff:
Starr International U.S.A. Investments LC and C.V. Starr & Co., Inc. Trust
Defendant:
Ernst & Young, LLP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Reeves v. Ernst & Young LLP
as 1:2011cv02039
Plaintiff:
William Reeves
Defendant:
Ernst & Young LLP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01284
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01283
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00212
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
