Cases 81 - 90 of 693
Stein v. Cornerstone Building Brands, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv02981
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
Defendant:
Cornerstone Building Brands, Inc., James S. Metcalf, Rose Lee and others
Moubarak v. Breitfeld et al
as 1:2022cv00467
Nominal Defendant:
Faraday Future Intelligent Electric Inc. and Property Solutions Acquisition Corp.
Plaintiff:
John Moubarak
Defendant:
Carsten Breitfeld, Zvi Glasman, Walter J. McBride and others
Lee v. Citrix Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01504
Plaintiff:
Arthur Lee
Defendant:
Citrix Systems, Inc., Bob Calderoni, Nanci Caldwell and others
BAKER v. LAWSON PRODUCTS, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv00842
Plaintiff:
LEWIS D BAKER
Defendant:
LAWSON PRODUCTS, INC., MICHAEL G DECATA, ANDREW B ALBERT and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Kelly v. Lawson Products, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01894
Plaintiff:
John Kelly
Defendant:
Lawson Products, Inc., Michael G. DeCata, Andrew B. Albert and others
Finger v. Lawson Products, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00287
Plaintiff:
Katherine Finger
Defendant:
Lawson Products, Inc., Michael G. Decata, Andrew H. Albert, I and others
Aamoth v. Shattuck Labs, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00795
Plaintiff:
Peter Aamoth
Defendant:
Shattuck Labs, Inc., Taylor Schreiber, Andrew Neill and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Yurco v. Lawson Products, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01201
Plaintiff:
John Yurco
Defendant:
Lawson Products, Inc., Michael G. DeCata, Andrew B. Albert and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Bell v. Lawson Products, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01056
Plaintiff:
Ema Bell
Defendant:
Lawson Products, Inc., Michael G. DeCata, Andrew B. Albert and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Viti v. Shattuck Labs, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00560
Plaintiff:
Andrea Viti
Defendant:
Shattuck Labs, Inc., Taylor Schreiber, Andrew Neill and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
