Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Securities And Exchange Commission v. Sanchez et al
as 4:2024cv00939
Plaintiff:
Securities And Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Ismael Zarco Sanchez, Gabriel Arguelles, Hector Aquino and others
Burbige et al v. ATI Physical Therapy, Inc. f/k/a Fortress Value Acquisition Corp. II et al
as 1:2021cv04349
Plaintiff:
Kevin Burbige, Ziyang Nie and Melbourne Firefighters' Retirement System
Defendant:
ATI Physical Therapy, Inc. f/k/a Fortress Value Acquisition Corp. II, Labeed Diab, Joseph Jordan and others
Petitioner:
Phillip Goldstein, The Freedom and Justice Foundation, David Turk and others
Lian v. Tuya Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv06792
Plaintiff:
Xiaomeng Lian
Defendant:
Tuya Inc., Xueji (Jerry) Wang, Liaohan (Leo) Chen and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 77 Securities Fraud
Kumar v. Diab et al
as 1:2022cv02466
Plaintiff:
Vinay Kumar
Defendant:
Labeed Diab, Joseph Jordan, John L. Larsen and others
McCullough v. Antares Pharma, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv02725
Plaintiff:
Cathy McCullough
Defendant:
Antares Pharma, Inc., Leonard S. Jacob, Thomas J. Garrity and others
Berry v. Antares Pharma, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv02483
Plaintiff:
Joe Berry
Defendant:
Antares Pharma, Inc., Leonard S. Jacob, Thomas J. Garrity and others
Wilson v. Antares Pharma, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00604
Plaintiff:
Jordan Wilson
Defendant:
Antares Pharma, Inc., Leonard S. Jacob, Thomas J. Garrity and others
Redfield v. Antares Pharma, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv02550
Plaintiff:
Denise Redfield
Defendant:
Antares Pharma, Inc., Leonard S. Jacob, Thomas J. Garrity and others
Finger v. Antares Pharma, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv03782
Plaintiff:
Katherine Finger
Defendant:
Antares Pharma, Inc., Leonard S. Jacob, Thomas J. Garrity and others
Stein v. Antares Pharma, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv03426
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
Defendant:
Antares Pharma, Inc., Leonard S. Jacob, M.D., Thomas J. Garrity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
