Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Pennsylvania Public School Employees' Retirement System v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 1:2011cv00733
Plaintiff:
Pipefitters Local No. 636 Defined Benefit Plan
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Anchorage Police & Fire Retirement System and Patricia Grossberg Living Trust
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation, William P. Boardman, Frank Paul Bramble, Sr and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Countrywide Financial Corporation, Kenneth D Lewis and Joseph L. Price
Petitioner:
Sjunde Ap-Fonden, Arkansas Teacher Retirement System, KBC Asset Management NV and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Gaia Holdings Ltd.
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Incorporated, UBS Securities LLC, SG Americas Securities LLC and others
Not Classified By Court:
Comptroller of the Currency, OCC, US Treasury Dept. and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, in its Corporate capacity
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Alaska Electrical Pension Fund v. Bank of Nova Scotia New York Agency et al
as 1:2015cv07420
Defendant:
Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Jefferies LLC, Daiwa Capital Markets America Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Alaska Electrical Pension Fund
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
Rock Capital Markets, LLC v. Bank of Nova Scotia, New York Agency et al
as 1:2015cv10117
Plaintiff:
Rock Capital Markets, LLC
Defendant:
Bank of Nova Scotia New York Agency, BMO Capital Markets Corp , BNP Paribas Securities Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25
IN RE MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC. SECURITIES, DERIVATIVE AND ERISA LITIGATION
as 1:2007cv09633
Lead Plaintiff:
State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio
Plaintiff:
Life Enrichment Foundation, Alan Maltzman, Carl Esposito and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Michael J. Savena, Gary Kosseff, Robert R. Garber and others
Petitioner:
Frankfurt Trust, James Conn, Anna Molin and others
Defendant:
Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., Stanley O'Neal, Ahmass L. Fakahany and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Merrill Lynch Capital Trust I, Merrill Lynch Capital Trust III, Lawrence A. Tosi and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Royal Park Investments SA/NV v. Bank of America Corp. et al
as 1:2013cv00490
Plaintiff:
Royal Park Investments SA/NV
Defendant:
Bank of America Corp., NB Holdings Corp., Countrywide Financial Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Phoenix Light SF Limited et al v. Bank of America Corp. et al
as 1:2013cv00494
Plaintiff:
Phoenix Light SF Limited , Silver Elms CDO, plc , Silver Elms II Ltd. and others
Defendant:
Bank of America Corp., NB Holdings Corp., Countrywide Financial Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Phoenix Light SF Limited et al v. Bank of America Corp. et al
as 1:2013cv00492
Plaintiff:
Phoenix Light SF Limited , Silver Elms CDP Plc , Silver Elms II Ltd. and others
Defendant:
Bank of America Corp., NB Holdings Corp., Countrywide Financial Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Royal Park Investments SA/NV v. Bank of America Corp. et al
as 1:2013cv00491
Plaintiff:
Royal Park Investments SA/NV
Defendant:
Bank of America Corp., NB Holdings Corp., Countrywide Financial Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Non-Motor Vehicle
Silver Elms CDO II Ltd. et al v. Bank of America Corp. et al
as 1:2013cv00501
Plaintiff:
Silver Elms CDO II Ltd. and Kleros Preferred Funding V Plc
Defendant:
Bank of America Corp., NB Holdings Corp., Countrywide Financial Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Deutsche Zentral-Genossenschaftsbank AG et al v. Bank Of America Corporation et al
as 1:2013cv00393
Plaintiff:
Deutsche Zentral-Genossenschaftsbank AG, Deutsche Genossenschafts-Hypothekenbank AG and DG Holding Trust
Defendant:
Bank Of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., Countrywide Securities Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452 R&R re motions to remand (non-core)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
