Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Wilson v. IHS Markit Ltd. et al
as 1:2021cv01700
Defendant:
Gay Huey Evans, James A. Rosenthal, Deborah Orida and others
Plaintiff:
Jordan Wilson
James Parshall v. IHS Markit Ltd. et al
as 1:2021cv01662
Plaintiff:
James Parshall
Defendant:
Gay Huey Evans, Deborah Orida, Lance Uggla and others
NGUYEN v. IHS MARKIT LTD et al
as 2:2021cv00848
Defendant:
GAY HUEY EVANS, IHS MARKIT LTD, RUANN F ERNST and others
Plaintiff:
MYLINH NGUYEN
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Kogus v. IHS Markit Ltd. et al
as 1:2021cv01285
Defendant:
Gay Huey Evans, Jean-Paul L. Montupet, Ruann F. Ernst and others
Plaintiff:
Esther Kogus
Shumacher v. IHS Markit Ltd. et al
as 1:2021cv00621
Defendant:
Gay Huey Evans, Jean-Paul L. Montupet, Deborah Orida and others
Plaintiff:
Leo Shumacher
Ye v. IHS Markit Ltd. et al
as 1:2021cv00617
Defendant:
Gay Huey Evans, Jean-Paul L. Montupet, Deborah Orida and others
Plaintiff:
Jing Ye
Shi v. IHS Markit Ltd. et al
as 1:2021cv00296
Defendant:
Gay Huey Evans, Jean-Paul L. Montupet, Deborah Orida and others
Plaintiff:
Tian Shi
Stein v. IHS Markit Ltd. et al
as 1:2021cv00229
Defendant:
Jean-Paul L. Montupet, Sapphire Subsidiary, Ltd., Deborah Orida and others
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
Louisiana Municipal Police Employees' Retirement System v. The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation et al
as 1:2011cv09175
Plaintiff:
Louisiana Municipal Police Employees' Retirement System
Defendant:
The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation, Robert P. Kelly, Bruce W. Van Saun and others
Movant:
Miami Firefighters' Relief and Pension Fund , Ironworkers Locals 40, 361 & 417 - Union Security Funds , DeKalb County Pension Fund and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Osirus v. Kelly et al
as 1:2009cv06069
Plaintiff:
John Osirus
Defendant:
Robert P. Kelly, CWABS Asset-Backed Certificates and Bank of New York Employees
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
