Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Empirex Capital LLC et al
as 1:2023cv23627
Defendant:
Rafael Alberto Vargas Gonzalez, Empirex Capital LLC and Rafael Vargas
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0077 Securities Fraud
Vargas v. Citrix Systems, Inc. et al
as 0:2022cv62327
Plaintiff:
Juan A. Vargas
Defendant:
Citrix Systems, Inc., Robert M. Calderoni, Nanci E. Caldwell and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078 Securities Exchange Act
Ayo v. Varga et al
as 0:2022cv62087
Plaintiff:
Olga Ayo
Defendant:
Matus Varga and Varga's Immigration Attorneys, PLLC a Florida professional limited liability company doing business as IMMIGRATION JUSTICE CENTER, PLLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078 Securities Exchange Act
Ryan v. AutoWeb, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv06909
Plaintiff:
John Ryan
Defendant:
AutoWeb, Inc., Michael J. Fuchs, Matias de Tezanos and others
Thollon v. AutoWeb, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv06893
Plaintiff:
John Thollon
Defendant:
AutoWeb, Inc., Michael J. Fuchs, Matias De Tezanos and others
Morgan v. AutoWeb, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01060
Plaintiff:
Anthony Morgan
Defendant:
AutoWeb, Inc., Michael J. Fuchs, Matas de Tezanos and others
Hopkins v. AutoWeb, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv06799
Plaintiff:
Matthew Hopkins
Defendant:
AutoWeb, Inc., Michael J. Fuchs, Matias de Tezanos and others
Wilson v. AutoWeb, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv06818
Plaintiff:
Jordan Wilson
Defendant:
AutoWeb, Inc., Michael J. Fuchs, Matias de Tezanos and others
Whitfield v. AutoWeb, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv06793
Plaintiff:
Matthew Whitfield, Matthew Hopkins, Jordan Wilson and others
Defendant:
AutoWeb, Inc., Michael J. Fuchs, Matias de Tezanos and others
Stein v. AutoWeb, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv06648
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein, Matthew Whitfield, Matthew Hopkins and others
Defendant:
AutoWeb, Inc., Michael J. Fuchs, Matias de Tezanos and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
