Cases 1 - 10 of 3,052
NARCISSO v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2024cv06356
Plaintiff:
RUTH D NARCISSO
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
SACKS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv06378
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SACKS
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
DAI v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2024cv06321
Plaintiff:
ADRIENNE DAI
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
SHORTLIDGE v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2024cv06334
Plaintiff:
JACQUELYN E SHORTLIDGE
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
FATUZZO II v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv06239
Plaintiff:
JOHN FATUZZO II
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
RODRIGUEZ v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2024cv06221
Plaintiff:
JUANA J. RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
MEDINA v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv06163
Plaintiff:
ANA J MEDINA
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
KOCI v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv06138
Plaintiff:
RAMAZAN KOCI
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
HAYDEN v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2024cv05970
Plaintiff:
PAUL JOSEPH HAYDEN
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
WOODEN v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2024cv05978
Plaintiff:
ALICE G. WOODEN
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
