Cases 1 - 10 of 124
Acosta v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00276
Plaintiff:
Justin Acosta
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Taylor v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00191
Plaintiff:
Valarie Jean Taylor
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Scheck v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00163
Petitioner:
Michael Scott Scheck
Respondent:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Pelley v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00253
Plaintiff:
Aimee Lynn Pelley
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Canfield v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00155
Petitioner:
Brian J. Canfield
Respondent:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Reardon v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2024cv00156
Plaintiff:
Damon Reardon
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Taylor v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00144
Petitioner:
Kyle Steven Taylor
Respondent:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Logston v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2024cv00133
Petitioner:
Brandy Carole Logston
Respondent:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Moon v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2024cv00130
Petitioner:
Dawn Louise Moon
Respondent:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Devenney v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2024cv00222
Petitioner:
Wendy Sune Devenney
Respondent:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
