Cases 1 - 10 of 182
Karamese v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv06453
Defendant:
SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF) and Commissioner of SSA Martin O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Hatiche N. Karamese
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Cooper v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv06383
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Plaintiff:
Robert Monroe Cooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Raydine Whiting v. Martin OMalley
as 5:2024cv01770
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA Martin O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Raydine Whiting
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Spindel v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv05211
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA Martin O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Jenett M. Spindel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Baker v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv04966
Plaintiff:
Catherine Lynn Baker
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Henke v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv03841
Defendant:
SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF) and Martin J. O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Michael Henke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Kitchen v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv03740
Defendant:
SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF) and Martin J. O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Erica Jean Kitchen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Tetler v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv03728
Defendant:
SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF) and Martin O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Michael Tetler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Richardson v. Martin O'Malley
as 5:2024cv03734
Plaintiff:
Clarence A. Richardson
Defendant:
SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF) and Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Ortiz v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv03670
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley and SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Plaintiff:
Michael Ortiz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
