Cases 1 - 10 of 7,942
Latorre v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv04560
Plaintiff:
Erica Latorre
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Camacho Delgado v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2024cv06407
Plaintiff:
Aura Camacho Delgado
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Baxter v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00809
Plaintiff:
Jessica A. Baxter
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Santos v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv04830
Plaintiff:
Nelson Alexander Santos
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Caro Jr. v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv04782
Plaintiff:
Domingo Caro Jr.
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Rankin v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00796
Plaintiff:
Jerrie Lynn Rankin
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Amaya v. Social Security
as 1:2024cv04724
Plaintiff:
Brian Amaya
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision (regarding payment of benefits)
Teeter v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2024cv06391
Plaintiff:
Casey Teeter
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Greenhill v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv04381
Plaintiff:
Sonya Greenhill
Defendant:
Commisioner Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Abreu v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv04629
Plaintiff:
Carmen Julia Abreu
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Rev. of Final Dec. of Sec. of HEW re: S.S. Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
