Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Johnson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2024cv00581
Plaintiff:
Carey L. Johnson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Curtis L Johnson v. Andrew Saul
as 2:2020cv06901
Plaintiff:
CURTIS L JOHNSON
Defendant:
Andrew Saul, Commisioner, Social Security Administration and Andrew Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Johnson v. Berryhill
as 4:2018cv00921
Plaintiff:
Howard L. Johnson
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson v. Berryhill
as 3:2017cv01647
Plaintiff:
David L. Johnson
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Johnson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2011at00389
Plaintiff:
Angelique L. Johnson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Johnson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2011cv01086
Plaintiff:
Angelique L. Johnson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Aleta L Johnson-Hamilton v. Michael J Astrue
as 5:2009cv01046
Plaintiff:
Aleta L Johnson-Hamilton
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue, Michael J Astrue and Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Johnson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2009cv00629
Plaintiff:
Laura L. Johnson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Clifton L. Johnson v. Michael J. Astrue
as 2:2008cv08009
Plaintiff:
Clifton L. Johnson
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue and Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Chanel L. Johnson v. Michael J. Astrue
as 2:2008cv03878
Plaintiff:
Chanel L Johnson
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue and Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.