Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Valentine v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration et al
as 1:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
Elet Terese Valentine and Elet Valentine
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration, State of Colorado, Colorado Department of Human Services and others
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing and USAO-SS-Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Kelly v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2023cv00755
Plaintiff:
Robert Martin Kelly
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing and USAO-SS-Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Chase v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2021cv03415
Plaintiff:
Kellie Corinn Chase
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing and USAO-SS-Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Fry III v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2021cv01627
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing and USAO-SS-Noticing
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Kristin Pulatie, Joseph B. Gaffney and others
Plaintiff:
Edmund Joseph Fry III and Edmund Joseph John Fry, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Beaudette v. Astrue
as 1:2012cv01978
Plaintiff:
Kelly A. Beaudette
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Interested_party:
SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Leet v. Astrue
as 1:2009cv02599
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Kelly Leet
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Saum v. Astrue
as 1:2009cv02091
Plaintiff:
Kellie Ann Saum
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Shoemaker v. Astrue
as 1:2008cv02714
Plaintiff:
Kelli L. Shoemaker
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
