Supplemental Security Income Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
RAMOS QUINONES v. KIJAKAZI
as 2:2022cv04770
Plaintiff: MICHELLE RAMOS QUINONES
Defendant: KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
RAMOS-VELAZQUEZ v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2018cv05563
Plaintiff: BRENDA L. RAMOS-VELAZQUEZ
Interested Party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Ramos v. Colvin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv00949
Plaintiff: Juan M. Ramos
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
RAMOS-VELAQUEZ v. COLVIN We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv01864
Plaintiff: BRENDA L. RAMOS-VELAQUEZ
Defendant: CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
RAMOS v. COLVIN We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv05546
Plaintiff: ELIZABETH RAMOS
Defendant: CAROLYN COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
RAMOS ORTIZ v. COLVIN We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2013cv04774
Plaintiff: CARMEN IVETTE RAMOS ORTIZ
Defendant: CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
RAMOS v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION et al
as 2:2012cv04794
Plaintiff: SANTITA VASQUEZ RAMOS
Defendant: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
PACHECO v. ASTRUE
as 5:2012cv04280
Plaintiff: EDGARDO RAMOS PACHECO
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
RAMOS v. ASTRUE We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2010cv03433
Plaintiff: EVERLIDIS GARCIA RAMOS
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
RAMOS v. ASTRUE
as 2:2010cv01022
Plaintiff: ALBERTO RAMOS
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?