Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Barnes, Jr. v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv01976
Plaintiff:
Raymond Barnes, Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Rev. of Final Dec. of Sec. of HEW re: S.S. Benefits
Wailes v. Saul
as 1:2021cv03450
Plaintiff:
Raymond Wailes
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Crespo v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2021cv00313
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Robert Raymond Crespo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Velez v. Saul
as 1:2020cv05795
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Raymond Velez
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Gomez v. Social Security
as 7:2019cv11779
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Raymond Jose Gomez
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Raymond v. Saul
as 1:2019cv01487
Plaintiff:
Kayla M. Raymond
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Canales v. Social Security
as 1:2019cv06117
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Raymond Emilio Canales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Martin v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2019cv00900
Plaintiff:
Raymond B. Martin
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Lozano v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2019cv06432
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Raymond Lozano
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Foerster v. Berryhill
as 2:2017cv06029
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Raymond R. Foerster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
