Cases 111 - 120 of 616
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. KIDZ KASTLE et al
as 2:2017cv12490
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
KIDZ KASTLE, CHARMAINE DEJESUS and JOSE A. DEJESUS
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. PIAZZA
as 3:2017cv12200
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JOHN PIAZZA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
U.S. BANK TRUST, N.A., AS TRUSTEE FOR LSF9 MASTER PARTCIPATION TRUST v. UNITED STATES
as 2:2017cv11703
Plaintiff:
U.S. BANK TRUST, N.A., AS TRUSTEE FOR LSF9 MASTER PARTCIPATION TRUST
Defendant:
UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
U.S. BANK TRUST, N.A., AS TRUSTEE FOR LSF9 MASTER PARTCIPATION TRUST v. UNITED STATES
as 2:2017cv11592
Plaintiff:
U.S. BANK TRUST, N.A., AS TRUSTEE FOR LSF9 MASTER PARTCIPATION TRUST
Defendant:
UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MCDAID
as 3:2017cv11484
Defendant:
WILLIAM MCDAID
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
BALICE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2017cv10291
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BALICE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7426
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. FITZGERALD et al
as 1:2017cv10322
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MICHAEL FITZGERALD, CAROLYN FITZGERALD, U.S. BANK and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
ESTATE OF AGNES R. SKEBA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2017cv10231
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF AGNES R. SKEBA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. HAMMED et al
as 2:2017cv09622
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
CHARLES HAMMED and MARGARET HAMMED
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MARK RAUCH et al.
as 3:2017cv09355
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MARK RAUCH, KAREN RAUCH and AMBOY NATIONAL BANK
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
