Cases 71 - 80 of 343
USA v. RaPower-3 et al
as 2:2015cv00828
Respondent:
LaGrand Johnson, XSun Energy, Solco I and others
Petitioner:
Kenneth Birrell, Ken Oveson, Todd Anderson and others
Defendant:
RaPower-3, LTB1, Neldon Johnson and others
Not Classified By Court:
Starlight Holdings, Solstice Enterprises, NP Johnson Family Limited Partnership and others
Plaintiff:
USA
Receiver:
Wayne Klein
Interested Party:
Nelson Snuffer Dahle Poulsen PC
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
ASVA et al v. USA
as 2:2015cv00568
Plaintiff:
ASVA and David M. Harris
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
USA v. Groesbeck, Clarence Jess the Estate of et al
as 2:2015cv00393
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Groesbeck, Clarence Jess the Estate of, Silvia Groesbeck, Winston Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
Johansen et al v. USA
as 2:2015cv00336
Plaintiff:
Thor V. Johansen and Unni Johansen
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422
USA v. Blamires
as 2:2015cv00310
Petitioner:
USA
Respondent:
Craig A. Blamires
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
Tanne et al v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service
as 2:2015cv00296
Plaintiff:
James S. Tanne and Megan M. Tanne
Defendant:
Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 7402 Refund of Taxes
Hansen v. United States of America
as 2:2015cv00223
Plaintiff:
L. DeLynn Hansen
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
USA v. TJ Enterprises & Acoustical et al
as 2:2015cv00065
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
TJ Enterprises & Acoustical, Gurule Properties, Linda Gurule and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
USA v. Hill et al
as 2:2015cv00034
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
David R. Hill, Paula E. Hill, DeeAnne C. Gilgen and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403
USA v. Hewlett
as 2:2014cv00922
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Ernest Hewlett
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
