Cases 151 - 160 of 5,000
DOE v. VALLEY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC.
as 2:2023cv00185
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE
Defendant:
VALLEY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. doing business as THE VALLEY HOSPITAL, INC. doing business as VALLEY HOME CARE, INC. doing business as VALLEY MEDICAL GROUP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
DUSA Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al v. Biofrontera Inc.
as 3:2023cv20601
Plaintiff:
DUSA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., SUN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES INC and SUN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD
Defendant:
Biofrontera Inc., BIOFRONTERA BIOSCIENCE GMBH, BIOFRONTERA PHARMA GMBH and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
ERY DIRECT, LLC v. AMMOCANMAN, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv20868
Plaintiff:
ERY DIRECT, LLC
Defendant:
AMMOCANMAN, LLC and THOMAS BOLLING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
KNIGHT v. META PLATFORMS, INC.
as 2:2023cv13347
Plaintiff:
KACY KNIGHT
Defendant:
META PLATFORMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
NEW YORK SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP et al v. THE TOWNSHIP OF CRANFORD, NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2021cv12306
Plaintiff:
NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC D/B/A AT&T MOBILITY, T-MOBILE NORTHEAST LLC, NEW YORK SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP D/B/A VERIZON WIRELESS and others
Defendant:
ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE TOWNSHIP OF CRANFORD, NEW JERSEY and THE TOWNSHIP OF CRANFORD, NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 251 Telecommunications Act of 1996 - Interconnection
TAWFIK v. VALLEY NATIONAL BANCORP d/b/a VALLEY NATIONAL BANK
as 2:2023cv20600
Plaintiff:
ESLAM TAWFIK
Defendant:
VALLEY NATIONAL BANCORP d/b/a VALLEY NATIONAL BANK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
ADVANCED NEUROSURGERY ASSOCIATES, PC v. MERITAIN HEALTH, INC.
as 2:2023cv20654
Plaintiff:
ADVANCED NEUROSURGERY ASSOCIATES, PC
Defendant:
MERITAIN HEALTH, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
